@article{KostogryzKupkaPiskunovetal.,
  author    = {Kostogryz, Nadiia M. and Kupka, Friedrich and Piskunov, Nikolai and Fabbian, Damian and Kr{\"u}ger, Daniel and Gizon, Laurent},
  title     = {Accurate Short-Characteristics Radiative Transfer in A Numerical Tool for Astrophysical Research (ANTARES)},
  series = {Solar Physics},
  journal   = {Solar Physics},
  subject      = {Astrophysics},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ShanReinersFabbianetal.,
  author    = {Shan, Yutong and Reiners, Ansgar and Fabbian, Damian and Marfil, Emilio and Montes, David and Tabernero, Hugo M. and Ribas, Ignasi and Caballero, Jose A. and Quirrenbach, Andreas and Amado, Pedro J. and Aceituno, Jesus and Bejar, Victor J. S. and Cortes-Contreras, Miriam and Dreizler, Stefan and Hatzes, Artie P. and Henning, Thomas and Jeffers, Sandra V. and Kaminski, Adrian and Kurster, Martin and Lafarga, Marina and Morales, Juan Carlos and Nagel, Evangelos and Palle, Enric and Passegger, Vera M. and Lopez, Cristina Rodriguez and Schweitzer, Andreas and Zechmeister, Mathias},
  title     = {The CARMENES search for exoplanets around M dwarfs Not-so-fine hyperfine-split vanadium lines in cool star spectra},
  series = {Astronomy \& Astrophysics},
  volume    = {654},
  journal   = {Astronomy \& Astrophysics},
  subject      = {Atomic data},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CubasArmasFabbian,
  author    = {Cubas Armas, Melania and Fabbian, Damian},
  title     = {Do MURaM and STAGGER Simulations of Solar Faculae Match Observational Signatures from Magnetic Structures?},
  series = {The Astrophysical Journal},
  volume    = {923},
  journal   = {The Astrophysical Journal},
  number    = {2},
  abstract  = {We compare results of simulations of solar facular-like conditions performed using the numerical codes MURaM and STAGGER. Both simulation sets have a similar setup, including the initial condition of ≈200 G vertical magnetic flux. After interpolating the output physical quantities to constant optical depth, we compare them and test them against inversion results from solar observations. From the snapshots, we compute the monochromatic continuum in the visible and infrared, and the full Stokes vector of the Fe i spectral line pair around 6301-6302 {\AA}. We compare the predicted spectral lines (at the simulation resolution and after smearing to the HINODE SP/SOT resolution) in terms of their main parameters for the Stokes I line profiles, and of their area and amplitude asymmetry for the Stokes V profiles. The codes produce magnetoconvection with similar appearance and distribution in temperature and velocity. The results also closely match the values from recent relevant solar observations. Although the overall distribution of the magnetic field is similar in both radiation-magnetohydrodynamic (RMHD) simulation sets, a detailed analysis reveals substantial disagreement in the field orientation, which we attribute to the differing boundary conditions. The resulting differences in the synthetic spectra disappear after spatial smearing to the resolution of the observations. We conclude that the two sets of simulations provide robust models of solar faculae. Nevertheless, we also find differences that call for caution when using results from RMHD simulations to interpret solar observational data.},
  subject      = {Magnetohydrodynamics},
  language  = {en}
}