@article{PastekaSantosdaCostaBarrosetal.,
  author    = {Pasteka, Richard and Santos da Costa, Joao Pedro and Barros, Nelson and Kolar, Radim and Forjan, Mathias},
  title     = {Patient-Ventilator Interaction Testing Using the Electromechanical Lung Simulator xPULMTM during V/A-C and PSV Ventilation Mode},
  series = {Applied Sciences},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Applied Sciences},
  number    = {9},
  abstract  = {During mechanical ventilation, a disparity between flow, pressure and volume demands of the patient and the assistance delivered by the mechanical ventilator often occurs. This paper introduces an alternative approach of simulating and evaluating patient-ventilator interactions with high fidelity using the electromechanical lung simulator xPULM™. The xPULM™ approximates respiratory activities of a patient during alternating phases of spontaneous breathing and apnea intervals while connected to a mechanical ventilator. Focusing on different triggering events, volume assist-control (V/A-C) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) modes were chosen to test patient-ventilator interactions. In V/A-C mode, a double-triggering was detected every third breathing cycle, leading to an asynchrony index of 16.67\%, which is classified as severe. This asynchrony causes a significant increase of peak inspiratory pressure (7.96 ± 6.38 vs. 11.09 ± 0.49 cmH2O, p < 0.01)) and peak expiratory flow (-25.57 ± 8.93 vs. 32.90 ± 0.54 L/min, p < 0.01) when compared to synchronous phases of the breathing simulation. Additionally, events of premature cycling were observed during PSV mode. In this mode, the peak delivered volume during simulated spontaneous breathing phases increased significantly (917.09 ± 45.74 vs. 468.40 ± 31.79 mL, p < 0.01) compared to apnea phases. Various dynamic clinical situations can be approximated using this approach and thereby could help to identify undesired patient-ventilation interactions in the future. Rapidly manufactured ventilator systems could also be tested using this approach. View Full-Text},
  subject      = {Breathing Simulation},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{PastekaForjan,
  author    = {Pasteka, Richard and Forjan, Mathias},
  title     = {Actively breathing mechanical lung simulator development and preliminary measurements},
  series = {IFMBE,volume 65; EMBEC \& NBC 2017},
  booktitle = {IFMBE,volume 65; EMBEC \& NBC 2017},
  subject      = {Biomedical Engineering},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PastekaSchoellbauerSantosdaCostaetal.,
  author    = {Pasteka, Richard and Sch{\"o}llbauer, Lara Alina and Santos da Costa, Joao Pedro and Kolar, Radim and Forjan, Mathias},
  title     = {Experimental Evaluation of Dry Powder Inhalers During In- and Exhalation Using a Model of the Human Respiratory System (xPULM™)},
  series = {Pharmaceutics},
  volume    = {2022},
  journal   = {Pharmaceutics},
  number    = {14/3},
  pages     = {15},
  abstract  = {Dry powder inhalers are used by a large number of patients worldwide to treat respiratory diseases. The objective of this work is to experimentally investigate changes in aerosol particle diameter and particle number concentration of pharmaceutical aerosols generated by four dry powder inhalers under realistic inhalation and exhalation conditions. To simulate patients undergoing inhalation therapy, the active respiratory system model (xPULM™) was used. A mechanical upper airway model was developed, manufactured, and introduced as a part of the xPULM™ to represent the human upper respiratory tract with high fidelity. Integration of optical aerosol spectrometry technique into the setup allowed for evaluation of pharmaceutical aerosols. The results show that there is a significant difference (p < 0.05) in mean particle diameter between inhaled and exhaled particles with the majority of the particles depositing in the lung, while particles with the size of (>0.5 μm) are least influenced by deposition mechanisms. The fraction of exhaled particles ranges from 2.13\% (HandiHaler®) over 2.94\% (BreezHaler®), and 6.22\% (Turbohaler®) to 10.24\% (Ellipta®). These values are comparable to previously published studies. Furthermore, the mechanical upper airway model increases the resistance of the overall system and acts as a filter for larger particles (>3 μm). In conclusion, the xPULM™ active respiratory system model is a viable option for studying interactions of pharmaceutical aerosols and the respiratory tract regarding applicable deposition mechanisms. The model strives to support the reduction of animal experimentation in aerosol research and provides an alternative to experiments with human subjects.},
  subject      = {Biomedical Engineering},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PastekaForjanSauermannetal.,
  author    = {Pasteka, Richard and Forjan, Mathias and Sauermann, Stefan and Drauschke, Andreas},
  title     = {Electro-mechanical Lung Simulator Using Polymer and Organic Human Lung Equivalents for Realistic Breathing Simulation},
  series = {Scientific Reports},
  volume    = {Vol 9},
  journal   = {Scientific Reports},
  number    = {No. 1},
  pages     = {Article number: 19778},
  abstract  = {Simulation models in respiratory research are increasingly used for medical product development and testing, especially because in-vivo models are coupled with a high degree of complexity and ethical concerns. This work introduces a respiratory simulation system, which is bridging the gap between the complex, real anatomical environment and the safe, cost-effective simulation methods. The presented electro-mechanical lung simulator, xPULM, combines in-silico, ex-vivo and mechanical respiratory approaches by realistically replicating an actively breathing human lung. The reproducibility of sinusoidal breathing simulations with xPULM was verified for selected breathing frequencies (10-18 bpm) and tidal volumes (400-600 ml) physiologically occurring during human breathing at rest. Human lung anatomy was modelled using latex bags and primed porcine lungs. High reproducibility of flow and pressure characteristics was shown by evaluating breathing cycles (nTotal = 3273) with highest standard deviation |3σ| for both, simplified lung equivalents (μV˙ = 23.98 ± 1.04 l/min, μP = -0.78 ± 0.63 hPa) and primed porcine lungs (μV˙ = 18.87 ± 2.49 l/min, μP = -21.13 ± 1.47 hPa). The adaptability of the breathing simulation parameters, coupled with the use of porcine lungs salvaged from a slaughterhouse process, represents an advancement towards anatomically and physiologically realistic modelling of human respiration.},
  subject      = {Breathing Simulation},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{PastekaSantosdaCostaForjan,
  author    = {Pasteka, Richard and Santos da Costa, Joao Pedro and Forjan, Mathias},
  title     = {Characteristic Waveforms for Testing of Medical Aerosol Inhalers},
  series = {8th European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference},
  booktitle = {8th European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference},
  publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
  pages     = {240 -- 246},
  abstract  = {Respiratory diseases are characterised by high prevalence among the European population. Medical aerosol inhalers are the most commonly used means of drug delivery into the human respiratory system. This paper focuses on characteristic waveforms that can be utilised during aerosol deposition studies to simulate conditions of rapid human inhalation. Additionally, an inhalatory waveform based on clinically recorded spirometry data is introduced. Experimental measurements are performed and simulation results mutually compared using the electro-mechanical lung simulator xPULM. The inhalatory waveforms are repeatably simulated with high fidelity in regards to the waveform shape with the lowest value of the Goodness of fit 0.89. Additionally, the measured values for all characteristic inhalatory parameters are simulated with low standard deviation < 1. The differences between the required and measured waveform shapes are small, < 3 L/min and do not influence the overall inhalatory volume. This opens a possibility of utilising the xPULM for medical aerosol inhalers testing.},
  subject      = {Breathing Simulation},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{PastekaForjanDrauschke,
  author    = {Pasteka, Richard and Forjan, Mathias and Drauschke, Andreas},
  title     = {Comparison of breathing patterns for aerosol inhalation using an electro-mechanical lung simulator},
  series = {ALTEX Proceedings - EUSAAT 2018, Linz},
  journal   = {ALTEX Proceedings - EUSAAT 2018, Linz},
  subject      = {Biomedical Engineering},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{ForjanPastekaDrauschke,
  author    = {Forjan, Mathias and Pasteka, Richard and Drauschke, Andreas},
  title     = {Lung simulation - an alterna� tive approach to animal testing for applications in aerosol and respiratory research},
  series = {ALTEX Proceedings - EUSAAT 2018, Linz},
  journal   = {ALTEX Proceedings - EUSAAT 2018, Linz},
  subject      = {Biomedical Engineering},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{PastekaForjan,
  author    = {Pasteka, Richard and Forjan, Mathias},
  title     = {Changes of particle deposition caused by different breathing patterns during active lung simulation},
  series = {41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2019},
  booktitle = {41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2019},
  organization    = {IEEE},
  pages     = {4969 -- 4972},
  subject      = {Lung Simulation},
  language  = {en}
}